In unveiling the measure, senators said they were aiming to curb images of child sex abuse by
forcing tech platforms to cooperate with law enforcement on encryption
or risk losing the legal immunity for what is posted on their websites. The measure unveiled ties together two separate issues
Encryption has been a point of contention between tech firms and law enforcement for decades. FBI officials have warned of "going dark" in investigating crimes as a result of new forms of end-to-end encryption, while civil rights advocates warn that any "backdoor" access could be exploited by hackers and authoritarian governments. The proposal "aims to kneecap encryption under the guise of protecting children online, while capitalizing on the techlash," said Riana Pfefferkorn of the Stanford University Center for Internet and Society, referring to the simmering discontent with Big Tech over data protection and other issues.
Critics say the bill, if enacted, could lead to draconian internet regulation.
Gary Shapiro, president of the Consumer Technology Association, a trade group including hundreds of online firms, said the bill "sets up the false choice between child safety and internet safety." Shapiro said in a blog post that the proposed law would not stop the use of encryption but "penalize American companies by forcing those interested in secure communication to move their business to offshore companies not governed by US law."
"You shouldn't need to get a pass from a commission of law enforcement agencies just to set up a website. That's the type of system we might hear about under an authoritarian regime." said Joe Mullin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Eric Goldman, director of Santa Clara University's High Tech Law Institute, said authorities are already unable to investigate the vast number of potential sex exploitation cases flagged by tech firms. "The core presumption of the bill is that companies aren't doing enough. I don't think that's true. They treat this as the most toxic and most problematic kind of content. The full implications of the bill remain unclear because standards would be set by a commission that would be created by lawmakers, Goldman said, adding that the panel could call for strict bans on encrypted apps or verification of the identity of all internet users, for example. "There is no limit to the perniciousness of the recommendations," he said.
Digital rights activists have joined the tech sector in arguing this move is an indirect way to weaken online encryption in the name of better law enforcement access.They say it erodes two cornerstones of the online ecosystem: strong encryption to keep data secure, and a liability shield which enables social media platforms to allow users to post content freely. The bill "would give government officials unprecedented powers to craft de facto regulations for online speech. Online service providers would almost certainly err on the side of caution and take down anything—including a lot of lawful, constitutionally protected speech." said Emma Llanso of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a digital rights organization.
A hearing is set for Wednesday on the measure, which is backed by victims' rights organizations. They, along with the Justice Department, have complained that existing laws protecting platforms such as social media companies from liability for user-posted content have allowed child pornography and images of exploitation to proliferate.
https://techxplore.com/news/2020-03-bill-online-child-abuse-encryption.html
- law enforcement's access to encrypted online content
- tech platforms' legal immunity for what users post.
Encryption has been a point of contention between tech firms and law enforcement for decades. FBI officials have warned of "going dark" in investigating crimes as a result of new forms of end-to-end encryption, while civil rights advocates warn that any "backdoor" access could be exploited by hackers and authoritarian governments. The proposal "aims to kneecap encryption under the guise of protecting children online, while capitalizing on the techlash," said Riana Pfefferkorn of the Stanford University Center for Internet and Society, referring to the simmering discontent with Big Tech over data protection and other issues.
Critics say the bill, if enacted, could lead to draconian internet regulation.
Gary Shapiro, president of the Consumer Technology Association, a trade group including hundreds of online firms, said the bill "sets up the false choice between child safety and internet safety." Shapiro said in a blog post that the proposed law would not stop the use of encryption but "penalize American companies by forcing those interested in secure communication to move their business to offshore companies not governed by US law."
"You shouldn't need to get a pass from a commission of law enforcement agencies just to set up a website. That's the type of system we might hear about under an authoritarian regime." said Joe Mullin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Eric Goldman, director of Santa Clara University's High Tech Law Institute, said authorities are already unable to investigate the vast number of potential sex exploitation cases flagged by tech firms. "The core presumption of the bill is that companies aren't doing enough. I don't think that's true. They treat this as the most toxic and most problematic kind of content. The full implications of the bill remain unclear because standards would be set by a commission that would be created by lawmakers, Goldman said, adding that the panel could call for strict bans on encrypted apps or verification of the identity of all internet users, for example. "There is no limit to the perniciousness of the recommendations," he said.
Digital rights activists have joined the tech sector in arguing this move is an indirect way to weaken online encryption in the name of better law enforcement access.They say it erodes two cornerstones of the online ecosystem: strong encryption to keep data secure, and a liability shield which enables social media platforms to allow users to post content freely. The bill "would give government officials unprecedented powers to craft de facto regulations for online speech. Online service providers would almost certainly err on the side of caution and take down anything—including a lot of lawful, constitutionally protected speech." said Emma Llanso of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a digital rights organization.
A hearing is set for Wednesday on the measure, which is backed by victims' rights organizations. They, along with the Justice Department, have complained that existing laws protecting platforms such as social media companies from liability for user-posted content have allowed child pornography and images of exploitation to proliferate.
https://techxplore.com/news/2020-03-bill-online-child-abuse-encryption.html
No comments :
Post a Comment