The collective activity of life—all of the microbes, plants, and animals—have changed planet Earth. Take, for example, plants: Plants "invented" a way of undergoing photosynthesis to enhance their own survival, but in so doing, released oxygen that changed the entire function of our planet. This is just one example of individual lifeforms performing their own tasks, but collectively having an impact on a planetary scale.
These are questions posed by Adam Frank, the Helen F. and Fred H. Gowen Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Rochester, and his colleagues David Grinspoon at the Planetary Science Institute and Sara Walker at Arizona State University, in a paper published in the International Journal of Astrobiology. Their self-described "thought experiment" combines current scientific understanding about the Earth with broader questions about how life alters a planet. In the paper, the researchers discuss what they call "planetary intelligence"—the idea of cognitive activity operating on a planetary scale—to raise new ideas.
Frank, Grinspoon, and Walker draw from ideas such as the Gaia hypothesis—which proposes that the biosphere interacts strongly with the non-living geological systems of air, water, and land to maintain Earth's habitable state—to explain that even a non-technologically capable species can display planetary Intelligence. The key is that the collective activity of life creates a system that is self-maintaining. For example, Frank says, many recent studies have shown how the roots of the trees in a forest connect via underground networks of fungi known as mycorrhizal networks. If one part of the forest needs nutrients, the other parts send the stressed portions the nutrients they need to survive, via the mycorrhizal network. In this way, the forest maintains its own viability.
The researchers posit four stages of Earth's past and possible future to illustrate how planetary intelligence might play a role in humanity's long-term future. They also show how these stages of evolution driven by planetary intelligence may be a feature of any planet in the galaxy that evolves life and a sustainable technological civilization.
Although we don't yet know specifically how planetary intelligence might manifest itself, the researchers note that a mature technosphere involves integrating technological systems with Earth through a network of feedback loops that make up a complex system. Put simply, a complex system is anything built from smaller parts that interact in such a fashion that the overall behavior of the system is entirely dependent on the interaction. That is, the sum is more than the whole of its parts. Examples of complex systems include forests, the Internet, financial markets, and the human brain. By its very nature, a complex system has entirely new properties that emerge when individual pieces are interacting.
It is difficult to discern the personality of a human being, for instance, solely by examining the neurons in her brain. That means it is difficult to predict exactly what properties might emerge when individuals form a planetary intelligence. However, a complex system like planetary intelligence will, according to the researchers, have two defining characteristics: It will have emergent behavior and will need to be self-maintaining.
Raising these questions, Frank says, will not only provide information about the past, present, and future survival of life on Earth but will also help in the search for life and civilizations outside our solar system. Frank, for instance, is the principal investigator on a NASA grant to search for technosignatures of civilizations on planets orbiting distant stars. "We're saying the only technological civilizations we may ever see—the ones we should expect to see—are the ones that didn't kill themselves, meaning they must have reached the stage of a true planetary intelligence," he says.
https://phys.org/news/2022-02-planet-mind.html
- If the collective activity of life—known as the biosphere—can change the world, could the collective activity of cognition, and action based on this cognition, also change a planet?
- Once the biosphere evolved, Earth took on a life of its own. If a planet with life has a life of its own, can it also have a mind of its own?
These are questions posed by Adam Frank, the Helen F. and Fred H. Gowen Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Rochester, and his colleagues David Grinspoon at the Planetary Science Institute and Sara Walker at Arizona State University, in a paper published in the International Journal of Astrobiology. Their self-described "thought experiment" combines current scientific understanding about the Earth with broader questions about how life alters a planet. In the paper, the researchers discuss what they call "planetary intelligence"—the idea of cognitive activity operating on a planetary scale—to raise new ideas.
Frank, Grinspoon, and Walker draw from ideas such as the Gaia hypothesis—which proposes that the biosphere interacts strongly with the non-living geological systems of air, water, and land to maintain Earth's habitable state—to explain that even a non-technologically capable species can display planetary Intelligence. The key is that the collective activity of life creates a system that is self-maintaining. For example, Frank says, many recent studies have shown how the roots of the trees in a forest connect via underground networks of fungi known as mycorrhizal networks. If one part of the forest needs nutrients, the other parts send the stressed portions the nutrients they need to survive, via the mycorrhizal network. In this way, the forest maintains its own viability.
The researchers posit four stages of Earth's past and possible future to illustrate how planetary intelligence might play a role in humanity's long-term future. They also show how these stages of evolution driven by planetary intelligence may be a feature of any planet in the galaxy that evolves life and a sustainable technological civilization.
- Stage 1—Immature biosphere: Characteristic of very early Earth, billions of years ago and before a technological species, when microbes were present but vegetation had not yet come about. There were few global feedbacks because life couldn't exert forces on Earth's atmosphere, hydrosphere, and other planetary systems.
- Stage 2—Mature biosphere: Characteristic of Earth, also before a technological species, from about 2.5 billion to 540 million years ago. Stable continents formed, vegetation and photosynthesis developed, oxygen built up in the atmosphere, and the ozone layer emerged. The biosphere exerted a strong influence on the Earth, perhaps helping to maintain Earth's habitability.
- Stage 3—Immature technosphere: Characteristic of Earth now, with interlinked systems of communication, transportation, technology, electricity, and computers. The technosphere is still immature, however, because it is not integrated into other Earth systems, such as the atmosphere. Instead, it draws matter and energy from Earth's systems in ways that will drive the whole into a new state that likely doesn't include the technosphere itself. Our current technosphere is, in the long run, working against itself.
- Stage 4—Mature technosphere: Where Earth should aim to be in the future, Frank says, with technological systems in place that benefit the entire planet, including globally harvesting energy in forms like solar that do not harm the biosphere. The mature technosphere is one that has co-evolved with the biosphere into a form that allows both the technosphere and the biosphere to thrive.
Although we don't yet know specifically how planetary intelligence might manifest itself, the researchers note that a mature technosphere involves integrating technological systems with Earth through a network of feedback loops that make up a complex system. Put simply, a complex system is anything built from smaller parts that interact in such a fashion that the overall behavior of the system is entirely dependent on the interaction. That is, the sum is more than the whole of its parts. Examples of complex systems include forests, the Internet, financial markets, and the human brain. By its very nature, a complex system has entirely new properties that emerge when individual pieces are interacting.
It is difficult to discern the personality of a human being, for instance, solely by examining the neurons in her brain. That means it is difficult to predict exactly what properties might emerge when individuals form a planetary intelligence. However, a complex system like planetary intelligence will, according to the researchers, have two defining characteristics: It will have emergent behavior and will need to be self-maintaining.
Raising these questions, Frank says, will not only provide information about the past, present, and future survival of life on Earth but will also help in the search for life and civilizations outside our solar system. Frank, for instance, is the principal investigator on a NASA grant to search for technosignatures of civilizations on planets orbiting distant stars. "We're saying the only technological civilizations we may ever see—the ones we should expect to see—are the ones that didn't kill themselves, meaning they must have reached the stage of a true planetary intelligence," he says.
https://phys.org/news/2022-02-planet-mind.html
https://gr.pinterest.com/bonjoylist/night-skies-in-australia-proof-of-flat-earth/?fbclid=IwAR1SFwrPXPKaTKG-bu5WZJjYpv_2DxkY5ZvMwZYDWAmTn7Wjku2Ds39TO5I
ReplyDeleteΑΝΟΗΣΙΕΣ ΚΟΥΡΗΤΗ;
ΜΕΓΙΣΤΟΥ ΜΑΛΙΣΤΑ ΒΑΘΜΟΥ.
DeleteΠΟΛΛΟΙ ΤΟ ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΖΟΥΝ ΠΑΝΤΩΣ.
DeleteΝΑΙ ΟΝΤΩΣ , ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΔΕΙΧΝΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΕΥΦΥΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΓΕΝΙΚΗΣ ΑΜΟΡΦΩΣΙΑΣ ΤΟΥΣ.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/embed/DtCIp9sgiE0
Deletehttps://bestnewshere.com/bombshell-the-dinosaurs-never-existed-must-video/
ΠΟΛΛΟΙ ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΖΟΥΝ ΟΤΙ ΚΑΤΙ ΔΕΝ ΣΤΕΚΕΙ (FABRICATED) ΜΕ ΤΑ ΟΣΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΕΙΝΟΣΑΥΡΩΝ. ΧΩΡΙΣ ΝΑ ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΖΩ ΤΟ INTELLIGENCE DESIGN, Η ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΞΕΛΙΞΗΣ ΕΧΕΙ ΚΑΠΟΙΑ ΒΑΣΗ ή ΕΙΝΑΙ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΗ ΑΝΟΗΣΙΕΣ ΚΟΥΡΗΤΗ;
Η ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΞΕΛΙΞΗΣ, ΕΧΕΙ ΒΑΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΟΤΙ ΑΦΟΡΑ ΤΗΝ ΠΡΟΣΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΩΝ ΣΤΙΣ ΚΛΙΜΑΤΟΛΟΓΙΚΕΣ ΣΥΝΘΗΚΕΣ. ΔΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΝΟΗΜΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΕΙΔΩΝ. ΑΥΤΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΔΙΚΗ ΜΟΥ ΑΠΟΨΗ.
DeleteΔΕΝ ΕΧΩ ΑΝΑΡΤΗΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΔΕΙΝΟΣΑΥΡΟΥΣ. ΔΕΝ ΜΕ ΕΝΔΙΕΦΕΡΕ, ΟΥΤΕ ΜΕ ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΕΙ ΤΟ ΘΕΜΑ. ΚΑΠΟΙΟΙ ΙΣΧΥΡΙΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΠΩΣ ΥΠΗΡΞΑΝΠΕΡΙΟΔΟΙ ΟΠΟΥ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΙΝΟΣΑΥΡΟΙ ΣΥΝΥΠΗΡΞΑΝ. ΔΕΝ ΓΝΩΡΙΖΩ. ΘΥΜΑΜΑΙ ΠΩΣ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟ ΠΑΡΕΛΘΟΝ ΕΙΧΑ ΔΙΑΒΑΣΕΙ ΑΡΘΡΟ ΟΠΟΥ ΥΠΟΤΙΘΕΤΑΙ ΑΡΧΑΙΑ ΑΓΑΛΜΑΤΙΔΙΑ ΕΙΚΟΝΙΖΑΝ ΘΗΛΑΖΟΝΤΕΣ ΣΑΥΡΕΣ. ΔΕΝ ΕΙΧΑ ΧΡΟΝΟ ΤΟΤΕ ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΟΥΤΕ ΜΕ ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΕΙ ΤΟ ΘΕΜΑ.
ΘΕΛΩ ΟΜΩΣ ΝΑ ΣΕ ΡΩΤΗΣΩ ΚΑΤΙ. ΠΟΙΑ Η ΣΚΟΠΙΜΟΤΗΤΑ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΣΗΣ ΔΕΙΝΟΣΑΥΡΩΝ ΑΝ ΑΥΤΟΙ ΔΕΝ ΥΠΗΡΞΑΝ ΠΟΤΕ; ΕΧΕ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΥΠΟΨΙΝ ΣΟΥ ΠΩΣ ΑΥΤΟΙ ΠΟΥ ΣΥΝΗΘΩΣ ΑΝΤΙΔΡΟΥΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΡΟΤΕΣΤΑΝΤΕΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΙΑΝΟΙ ΟΙ ΟΠΟΙΟΙ ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΟΥΝ ΝΑ ΔΕΙΞΟΥΝ ΠΩΣ Η ΧΡΟΝΟΛΟΓΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΒΙΒΛΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΡΘΗ. ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΟΥΝ ΔΛΔ ΝΑ ΠΕΡΙΟΡΙΣΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΠΛΑΝΗΤΗ, ΕΝΤΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΚΩΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΧΡΟΝΟΛΟΓΗΣΕΩΝ.
Η ΕΝΟΤΗΤΑ ΑΥΤΗ https://isxys.blogspot.com/search/label/%CE%91%CF%81%CF%87%CE%B1%CE%AF%CE%B1%20%CE%99%CF%83%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%81%CE%AF%CE%B1%20-%20%CE%9C%CF%85%CE%B8%CE%BF%CE%BB%CE%BF%CE%B3%CE%AF%CE%B1 ΠΕΡΙΛΑΜΒΑΝΕΙ ΔΕΚΑΔΕΣ ΑΝΑΡΤΗΣΕΙΣ ΠΟΥ ΥΠΟΔΕΙΚΝΥΟΥΝ ΚΑΤΑ ΠΟΛΥ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΗ ΑΡΧΑΙΟΤΕΡΗ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ ΑΠΟ ΟΤΙ ΚΟΙΝΩΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΠΟΔΕΚΤΗ.
ΔΛΔ ΑΝ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΑ ΣΩΣΤΑ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΨΗ ΣΟΥ ΔΕΝ ΚΑΤΑΓΟΜΑΣΤΕ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΠΙΘΗΚΟΥΣ. ΑΝ ΕΧΕΙΣ ΧΡΟΝΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΕ ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΕΙ, ΚΑΤ'ΕΣΕ ΤΑ ΤΡΙΑ ΕΙΔΗ (ΛΕΥΚΟ, ΚΙΤΡΙΝΟ ΚΑΙ ΜΑΥΡΟ) ΑΠΟ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΤΑΓΟΝΤΑΙ; ΕΚΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΝ ΑΠΟΔΕΧΕΣΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΙΣΧΥΡΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΕΑ.
DeleteΕΧΕΙΣ ΔΙΚΙΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΝΤΙΔΡΩΝΤΕΣ. Η ΔΕ ΣΚΟΠΙΜΟΤΗΤΑ ΑΝΑΛΥΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΝΤΟΚΥΜΑΝΤΕΡ, ΧΡΗΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΟΦΕΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΡΟΠΑΓΑΝΔΙΣΤΙΚΟ ΟΦΕΛΟΣ ΤΑ ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΑ 150 ΧΡΟΝΙΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΥΝΗΘΕΙΣ ΑΝΑΘΕΩΡΗΤΕΣ.
ΔΕΝ ΥΠΗΡΞΕ ΜΙΑ ΜΟΝΟΝ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΓΕΝΕΣΗ ΣΤΟΝ ΠΛΑΝΗΤΗ. ΥΠΗΡΞΑΝ ΠΟΛΛΕΣ. ΚΑΠΟΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΣΑΡΜΟΣΤΗΚΑΝ ΕΞΕΛΙΚΤΙΚΑ, ΚΑΠΟΙΕΣ ΑΠΕΤΥΧΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΞΑΦΑΝΙΣΤΚΑΝ, ΑΛΛΕΣ ΣΥΜΠΤΥΧΘΗΣΑΝ ΜΕΤΑΞΥ ΤΟΥΣ. ΟΙ ΦΥΛΕΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΔΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΩΝ, ΕΔΩΣΑΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΒΑΣΙΚΟΥΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΤΥΠΟΥΣ. (ΛΕΥΚΟΥΣ-ΜΑΥΡΟΥΣ -ΚΙΤΡΙΝΟΥΣ).
DeleteΤΟ ΠΩΣ ΕΚΚΙΝΗΘΗΣΑΝ ΟΙ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΓΕΝΕΣΕΩΝ ΔΕΝ ΤΟ ΓΝΩΡΙΖΩ. ΣΕ ΑΥΤΟΝ ΤΟΝ ΤΟΜΕΑ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΑΝΑΠΟΔΕΙΚΤΗ ΑΠΟΨΗ ΟΛΕΣ ΟΙ ΘΡΗΣΚΕΙΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΛΛΟΙ ΑΛΛΟΙ ΜΕΤΑΞΥ ΤΩΝ ΟΠΟΙΩΝ ΚΑΙ Η ΟΕΑ. Ο ΚΑΘΕΙΣ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΕΧΕΙ ΑΠΟΨΗ Η Η ΟΠΟΙΑ ΟΜΩΣ ΔΙΑΜΟΡΦΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΚΥΡΙΩΣ ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΘΡΗΣΚΕΥΤΙΚΑ ΠΙΣΤΕΥΩ ΤΟΥ, ΤΗΝ ΕΥΦΥΙΑ ΤΟΥ, ΤΗΝ ΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΤΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ ΤΟΥ.
ΠΕΡΙ ΣΚΟΠΙΜΟΤΗΤΟΣ ΜΙΑ ΑΚΟΜΗ ΠΑΡΑΤΗΡΗΣΗ. ΟΙ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΑ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΟΙ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΑΝΤΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ ΠΕΡΙ ΔΕΙΝΟΣΑΥΡΩΝ ΔΕΝ ΝΟΜΙΖΩ ΟΤΙ ΤΑ ΠΗΡΑΝ ή ΤΑ ΠΑΙΡΝΟΥΝ. ΑΥΤΟΙ ΠΟΥ ΤΑ ΠΑΙΡΝΟΥΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΣΟΙ ΕΜΠΟΡΙΚΑ ΕΚΜΕΤΑΛΛΕΥΘΗΣΑΝ ΤΗΝ "ΤΡΕΛΑ" ΠΕΡΙ ΔΕΙΝΟΣΑΥΡΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΟΣΟΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΡΩΘΟΥΝ. ΑΥΤΟΙ , ΝΑΙ, ΕΙΧΑΝ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝ , ΚΑΙ ΟΦΕΛΟΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΟΛΟΝ.
DeleteΗ ΔΕΙΝΟΣΑΥΡΙΚΗ ΤΡΕΛΑ ΟΜΩΣ ΔΕΝ ΝΟΜΙΖΩ ΟΤΙ ΑΓΓΙΖΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΕΣ. ΕΞΑΛΛΟΥ ΤΟ ΟΛΟ ΘΕΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΓΩ ΤΗΣ ΜΕΓΕΘΥΝΣΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΥΠΟΝΟΕΙΤΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΒΙΝΤΕΟ ΟΤΙ ΑΠΟ ΚΑΠΟΥ ΕΚΠΟΡΕΥΕΤΑΙ ΚΑΙ ΕΧΕΙ ΑΛΛΟΥΣ ΚΥΡΙΩΣ ΣΚΟΠΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΟΧΙ ΑΠΛΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΠΙΔΙΩΞΗ ΠΛΟΥΤΙΣΜΟΥ-ΚΕΡΔΟΥΣ.
ΕΠΕΙΔΗ ΦΑΝΤΑΖΟΜΑΙ ΤΙ ΥΠΟΝΟΟΥΝ ΩΣ ΚΕΝΤΡΙΚΗ ΣΚΟΠΙΜΟΤΗΤΑ ΟΙ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΟΙ ΤΟΥ ΒΙΝΤΕΟ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΝ ΔΕΚΑΔΩΝ ΑΛΛΩΝ ΠΟΥ ΚΥΚΛΟΦΟΡΟΥΝ, ΘΕΛΩ ΝΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΚΟΥΣΩ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΛΕΝΕ ΕΥΘΕΩΣ ΚΑΙ ΟΧΙ ΣΤΡΙΦΟΓΥΡΙΖΟΝΤΑΣ ΓΥΡΩ ΤΟΥ. ΑΥΤΟ ΕΝΝΟΥΣΑ ΡΩΤΩΝΤΑΣ ΣΕ, "ΠΟΙΑ Η ΣΚΟΠΙΜΟΤΗΤΑ"
@Anonymous 22/2/22 16:29
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91K22wT0fpY&list=PLESmFyDtsex9p2B6RIaKzszJQJUSM3Hux
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_bncEN38HY
ReplyDeleteΝΑ ΤΟΝ ΡΩΤΗΣΟΥΜΕ. ΚΑΤΙ ΠΑΡΑΠΑΝΩ ΘΑ ΓΝΩΡΙΖΕΙ.
ΣΤΕΝΤΩΡ
https://phys.org/news/2022-03-life-earth-deep-mantle.html
ReplyDeletehttps://www.alexstrekeisen.it/english/vulc/kimberlites.php
Delete"What is less obvious, however, is that the reverse is also true: what happens on the Earth's surface effect the Earth's interior—even down to great depths. This is the conclusion reached by an international group of researchers led by Andrea Giuliani, SNSF Ambizione Fellow in the Department of Earth Sciences at ETH Zurich, in a new study published in the journal Science Advances. According to this study, the development of life on our planet affects parts of Earth's lower mantle."
ΛΟΓΙΚΟ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ; ΠΡΟΣ ΤΙ Η ΕΚΠΛΗΞΙΣ;
ΦΑΝΤΑΖΟΜΑΙ ΠΩΣ ΑΝ ΟΙ ΑΡΧΑΙΟΙ ΤΟ ΧΡΗΣΙΜΟΠΟΙΟΥΣΑΝ, ΩΣ ΜΩΣΑΙΚΟ ΘΑ ΗΤΑΝ ΦΑΝΤΑΣΤΙΚΟ.
ΣΤΕΝΤΩΡ
Could this be true, mate?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bitchute.com/video/bOO8PGgN7Z2e/
Some early vid's from '50s-'60s are hoaxes, propaganda in order to "proof" advancement in nuclear race. The weapons today are very real.
DeleteCheers.
Deletehttps://www.bitchute.com/channel/thenuclearhoax/
ReplyDelete