Officials at the United States Central Intelligence Agency have questioned whether it is safe for them to reveal the sources of their information about Russia to America’s new President, Donald Trump, according to a report. The implication is that some at the CIA are concerned that Trump’s allegedly close ties with Russian officials may put CIA operations officers in danger. The information was shared on Monday by Mary Louise Kelly, national security correspondent for National Public Radio (NPR). She told the Washington-based station that relations between the CIA and the new American president remain cool, despite the apparent rapprochement between the two sides last Saturday, when Trump gave a speech at the CIA headquarters. Kelly cited Steve Hall, a former CIA operations officer who retired from the agency in 2015 after three decades in the National Clandestine Service, which is runs intelligence operations around the world. Hall spent time in Europe, Latin America and Central Eurasia, and some believe he was CIA station chief (America’s senior intelligence representative) in Moscow for a number of years. Hall retired as a member of the CIA’s Senior Intelligence Service, which consists of the most senior members of the National Clandestine Service.
In her report, Kelly identified Hall as the CIA’s former “chief of Russia operations”. She told NPR that Kelly had responded with skepticism to President Trump’s speech at the CIA headquarters last weekend. He wondered, she said, what would happen if the CIA collected “a stellar piece of intelligence that […] puts [Russian President] Vladimir Putin in a bad light?”. Presumably the Agency would have to brief the US leader about the finding. But what if the president inquired about the source? The CIA would have to reveal its methods and sources, because that information cannot be kept from the president. According to Kelly, Hall asked: “How can you say no, we don’t trust you with the sourcing of that information?”. And continued: “[t]hat is a live question today at Langley”, referring to the location of the CIA headquarters in the US state of Virginia. Last month, Hall wrote a guest column in The Washington Post in which he touched on the importance of sources and methods for the CIA. He wrote that the agency’s collection capabilities “could be rendered useless in one news cycle if disclosure is not handled correctly. [And] if it were human sources that provided the information, they could lose their lives”. Hall went on to argue that, if the CIA revealed its information about Russia’s alleged attempts to influence last November’s US presidential election, additional information would be demanded of it. “Questions like, ‘How exactly did you get that information?’ or ‘Where did that come from?’ and ‘When precisely did you know that?’ will inevitably be asked —and the protection of sources and methods will begin to erode”, wrote the retired CIA operations officer.
Joseph Fitsanakis
https://intelnews.org/2017/01/25/01-2049/
In her report, Kelly identified Hall as the CIA’s former “chief of Russia operations”. She told NPR that Kelly had responded with skepticism to President Trump’s speech at the CIA headquarters last weekend. He wondered, she said, what would happen if the CIA collected “a stellar piece of intelligence that […] puts [Russian President] Vladimir Putin in a bad light?”. Presumably the Agency would have to brief the US leader about the finding. But what if the president inquired about the source? The CIA would have to reveal its methods and sources, because that information cannot be kept from the president. According to Kelly, Hall asked: “How can you say no, we don’t trust you with the sourcing of that information?”. And continued: “[t]hat is a live question today at Langley”, referring to the location of the CIA headquarters in the US state of Virginia. Last month, Hall wrote a guest column in The Washington Post in which he touched on the importance of sources and methods for the CIA. He wrote that the agency’s collection capabilities “could be rendered useless in one news cycle if disclosure is not handled correctly. [And] if it were human sources that provided the information, they could lose their lives”. Hall went on to argue that, if the CIA revealed its information about Russia’s alleged attempts to influence last November’s US presidential election, additional information would be demanded of it. “Questions like, ‘How exactly did you get that information?’ or ‘Where did that come from?’ and ‘When precisely did you know that?’ will inevitably be asked —and the protection of sources and methods will begin to erode”, wrote the retired CIA operations officer.
Joseph Fitsanakis
https://intelnews.org/2017/01/25/01-2049/
ΣΧΟΛΙΟ "ΙΣΧΥΣ": ΑΥΤΟΙ ΟΙ ΚΑΠΟΙΟΙ ΠΟΥ ...ΑΝΑΡΩΤΙΟΥΝΤΑΙ, ΣΥΝΤΟΜΑ ΘΑ ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΣΟΥΝ ΠΟΙΝΕΣ ΦΥΛΑΚΙΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΜΩΡΙΑΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΑ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΟΙΝΙΚΟ ΚΩΔΙΚΑ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΝ ΠΕΙΘΑΡΧΙΚΟ/ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΟ ΚΩΔΙΚΑ ΤΗΣ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΑΣ ΤΟΥΣ, ΜΟΛΙΣ ΑΝΑΚΑΛΥΦΘΕΙ ΠΛΗΡΩΣ ΤΟ ΕΥΡΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΑΣΥΝΔΕΣΗΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΜΕ ΑΛΛΟΤΡΙΕΣ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΕΣ, ΟΡΓΑΝΩΣΕΙΣ, ΜΥΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΧΩΡΕΣ ΕΚΤΟΣ ΗΠΑ. ΤΟ ΞΕΚΑΘΑΡΙΣΜΑ ΠΟΥ ΕΡΧΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΟΤΙ ΜΑΘΑΙΝΟΥΜΕ ΘΑ ΠΕΡΙΛΑΜΒΑΝΕΙ ΔΙΑΣΤΗΜΑ ΤΟΥΛΑΧΙΣΤΟΝ 10 ΕΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΜΙΑ ΤΕΡΑΣΤΙΑ ΕΥΚΑΙΡΙΑ ΑΠΟΛΥΜΑΝΣΗΣ ΑΠΟ ΟΛΑ ΑΥΤΑ ΤΑ ΕΠΙΟΡΚΑ ΤΡΩΚΤΙΚΑ.
No comments :
Post a Comment