1. Stealth. Stealth was a main feature of the F-22 and the plane’s design maximized sensor evasion with diamond shaped wings and sharp faceted surfaces. The speed brake, weapon bay doors and engine exhausts are designed to minimize ….. Both fighter jets greatly differs when it comes to stealth and the comparison is not in the SU 57's favor.
2. Maneuverability. The F-22 Raptor is the most maneuverable fighter the U.S. has ever made. The Raptor uses two-dimensional vector-thrust jets which can only go up and down in unison……. On the other hand, SU 57 is even more maneuverable. The Russian fighter uses three-dimensional thrust-vector jets. Its engine nozzles can literally tilt independently in any direction to assist it in executing maneuvers….
3. Power&Speed. The F-22 is powered by a pair of F119 afterburning turbofan engines that produces a total 70,000 pounds of thrust. The engines allow the Raptor to super cruise at Mach 1.82 without afterburners, enhancing the aircraft’s range…. A major driver of the Su-57’s performance is its two engines. The engines are capable of generating around 71,000 pounds of thrust. These are meant to drive the fighter to maximum speed of up to Mach 1.8 in super cruise mode……
4. Radars&Avionics. The F-22 and the SU 57 both have Active Electronically Scanned Array radars which are stealthier more resistant to jamming and boast higher fidelity. The F-22 and SU 57 will be able to detect each other as they close within fifty kilometers, however which one first is a subject of debate. In order to detect stealth jets, the SU 57 also have a modern Infra-Red Search and Track system with a fifty-kilometer range. The raptor’s engines nozzles are designed to reduce heat signature, diminishing detection range, while the SU 57 engines …….
5. Firepower. The Raptor has three weapons bays. One of which can carry one Sidewinder missile. The second bay can accommodate six am-ram missiles with a range of up to 112 miles…… On the other hand, the Russian jet has 2 large internal weapons bays, taking up virtually the entire length of the aircraft. Each bay can carry up to four beyond visual range radar-guided missiles with ranges up to …… Both planes carry long range radar-guided missiles of comparable effectiveness. Russia has its cutting-edge K-77M missiles with a reported range of 122 miles, and the United States has the am-ram Scorpion with a range in excess of 112 miles……
2. Maneuverability. The F-22 Raptor is the most maneuverable fighter the U.S. has ever made. The Raptor uses two-dimensional vector-thrust jets which can only go up and down in unison……. On the other hand, SU 57 is even more maneuverable. The Russian fighter uses three-dimensional thrust-vector jets. Its engine nozzles can literally tilt independently in any direction to assist it in executing maneuvers….
3. Power&Speed. The F-22 is powered by a pair of F119 afterburning turbofan engines that produces a total 70,000 pounds of thrust. The engines allow the Raptor to super cruise at Mach 1.82 without afterburners, enhancing the aircraft’s range…. A major driver of the Su-57’s performance is its two engines. The engines are capable of generating around 71,000 pounds of thrust. These are meant to drive the fighter to maximum speed of up to Mach 1.8 in super cruise mode……
4. Radars&Avionics. The F-22 and the SU 57 both have Active Electronically Scanned Array radars which are stealthier more resistant to jamming and boast higher fidelity. The F-22 and SU 57 will be able to detect each other as they close within fifty kilometers, however which one first is a subject of debate. In order to detect stealth jets, the SU 57 also have a modern Infra-Red Search and Track system with a fifty-kilometer range. The raptor’s engines nozzles are designed to reduce heat signature, diminishing detection range, while the SU 57 engines …….
5. Firepower. The Raptor has three weapons bays. One of which can carry one Sidewinder missile. The second bay can accommodate six am-ram missiles with a range of up to 112 miles…… On the other hand, the Russian jet has 2 large internal weapons bays, taking up virtually the entire length of the aircraft. Each bay can carry up to four beyond visual range radar-guided missiles with ranges up to …… Both planes carry long range radar-guided missiles of comparable effectiveness. Russia has its cutting-edge K-77M missiles with a reported range of 122 miles, and the United States has the am-ram Scorpion with a range in excess of 112 miles……
Το ρωσικό πρόγραμμα δεν σταμάτησε τελικά? Ούτε οι ινδοί δεν το ήθελαν στο τέλος!
ReplyDelete12G
ΣΥΝΕΧΙΖΕΤΑΙ, ΑΛΛΑ ΜΕ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ. ΕΝΑ ΣΟΒΑΡΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΙ ΚΙΝΗΤΗΡΕΣ, Η ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΤΩΝ ΟΠΟΙΩΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΜΕΙΝΕΙ ΠΙΣΩ. ΤΩΡΑ ΤΑ ΠΡΩΤΟΤΥΠΑ ΦΟΡΟΥΝ ΑΚΟΜΗ ΤΟΥΣ ΠΑΛΙΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΝΟΜΙΖΩ ΠΩΣ ΔΥΟ ΜΟΝΟΝ ΑΠΟ ΑΥΤΑ, ΔΟΚΙΜΑΖΟΥΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΝΕΟΥΣ.
ReplyDeleteΚΟΥΡΗΤΗΣ
Επειδή κάτι θυμάμαι ότι είχαν αποφασίσει να μην το βγάλουν σε μαζική παραγωγή τελικά. Κάπου στον ιούλιο είχα διαβάσει αυτήν την είδηση.
ReplyDelete12G
ΟΧΙ ΝΩΡΙΤΕΡΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 23-24 , ΙΣΩΣ ΑΥΤΟ ΕΝΝΟΕΙΣ; ΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΕΣ ΟΙ ΗΜΕΡΟΜΗΝΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΕΘΕΤΑΝ ΕΛΑΧΙΣΤΑ ΗΣΣΟΝΟΣ ΣΗΜΑΣΙΑΣ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΚΕΣ ΧΡΗΜΑΤΟΔΟΤΗΣΕΙΣ, ΣΥΜΦΩΝΑ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΧΡΟΝΟΔΙΑΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΑΡΧΙΚΟΥ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΙΣΜΟΥ.
ReplyDeleteΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΑΥΤΗ Η ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΗ. ΓΙΑ ΠΑΡΑΔΕΙΓΜΑ ΟΙ ΚΙΝΗΤΗΡΕΣ ΘΑ ΕΠΡΕΠΕ ΤΟ 2017 ΝΑ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΠΑΡΑΔΟΘΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΟΧΙ ΝΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΚΟΜΗ ΣΕ ΣΤΑΔΙΟ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ.
ΕΑΝ ΞΕΠΕΡΑΣΟΥΝ ΤΟ 2025, ΤΟΤΕ ΤΟ ΟΛΟΝ ΘΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΗΔΗ ΞΕΠΕΡΑΣΜΕΝΟ ΤΕΧΝΟΛΟΓΙΚΑ.
ΟΙ ΚΙΝΗΤΗΡΕΣ ΟΜΩΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΚΑΙ ΘΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΝΤΩΣ ΣΟΒΑΡΗ ΕΠΕΝΔΥΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΝ ΝΑ ΥΛΟΠΟΙΗΘΟΥΝ ΣΕ ...ΑΛΛΟ "ΣΚΑΡΙ" ΜΕ ΑΛΛΟ ΟΝΟΜΑ.
http://www.defence-point.gr/news/argi-akoma-o-kinitiras-tou-rosikou-af-su-57-para-tin-proti-dokimi
ΚΟΥΡΗΤΗΣ
Όχι όχι, αυτή εδώ η είδηση είναι και ήταν σε πολλά πρακτορεία...
ReplyDeleteRussia’s ‘stealth-killer’ fighter project has been abandoned
https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/russias-stealthkiller-fighter-project-has-been-abandoned/news-story/03e50ea76d6a5dfb5aaac69b9c75fbd6
Άμα γκουγκλάρης "su 57 program stops" θα βγάλει ένα κάρο αποτελέσματα!
12G
12G
ReplyDeleteΤΑ ΠΕΡΙΣΣΟΤΕΡΑ ΑΠΟ ΑΥΤΑ ΤΑ ΑΡΘΡΑ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΨΗ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ. ΝΑΙ, ΟΙ ΙΝΔΟΙ ΔΕΝ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΕΧΟΥΝ ΠΛΕΟΝ, ΑΛΛΑ Η ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΔΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΣΤΑΜΑΤΗΣΕΙ. ΟΙ ΡΩΣΣΟΙ ΤΟ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΚΑΤΕΒΑΣΕΙ ΣΕ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΑ AIR-SHOWS. ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΑΙΝΕΙ, ΝΟΜΙΖΩ ΠΩΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΣΟΥ ΓΡΑΦΩ.
ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΛΗΘΕΣ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΠΩΣ ΟΙ ΠΑΡΑΓΓΕΛΙΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΡΩΣΣΙΚΗ ΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΗ ΑΕΡΟΠΟΡΙΑ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΜΕΙΩΘΕΙ ΠΟΛΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΡΑ ΟΜΙΛΟΥΝ ΓΙΑ ΛΙΓΟΤΕΡΑ ΑΠΟ 100 ΚΟΜΜΑΤΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΜΑΛΙΣΤΑ ΠΑΡΑΔΟΤΕΑ ΣΕ ΟΡΙΖΟΝΤΑ ΣΧΕΔΟΝ ΔΕΚΑΕΤΙΑΣ.
ΜΑΛΛΟΝ Η ΚΑΚΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΡΩΣΣΙΑΣ ΦΡΕΝΑΡΕ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ;
ΤΟ ΑΕΡΟΣΚΑΦΟΣ , STEALTH, ΞE-STEALTH ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΟΛΥ ΚΑΛΟ (ΚΑΛΥΤΕΡΟ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ SU-35). ΕΑΝ ΥΛΟΠΟΙΗΣΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΣΟΥΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΝΕΟΥΣ ΚΙΝΗΤΗΡΕΣ ΓΡΗΓΟΡΑ (ΠΡΙΝ ΤΟ 2025) ΑΠΟ ΑΠΟΨΗ ΑΕΡΟΝΑΥΤΙΚΗΣ ΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΟΣ ΘΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ ΚΑΛΥΤΕΡΟ ΑΕΡΟΣΚΑΦΟΣ ΠΟΥ ΠΕΤΑΞΕ ΠΟΤΕ. (ΙΣΩΣ ΤΟ ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΟ ΚΟΜΜΑΤΙ ΑΥΤΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΧΟΛΗΣ).
ΚΟΥΡΗΤΗΣ